INA245.com

Adjustment of Status While in Removal Proceedings

Problems, Denials & Jurisdiction · Defensive Adjustment

Adjustment of Status While in Removal Proceedings

Adjustment of status can be available as relief from removal. For a non-arriving alien in INA §240 proceedings, the immigration judge generally has exclusive jurisdiction over Form I-485. The respondent must establish an approved or otherwise qualifying immigrant basis, visa availability where required, adjustment eligibility, admissibility or an available waiver, and favorable discretion. Current EOIR procedures require the respondent to file Form I-485 with the immigration court, serve DHS counsel, comply with applicable fee procedures, and complete USCIS biometrics and background-check requirements before the immigration judge can grant permanent residence.

Form I-485
General Forum Immigration Court
Applicant Respondent
Burden Eligibility + Discretion

Can someone adjust status while in removal proceedings?

Direct Answer Yes. A non-arriving respondent in removal proceedings can seek adjustment of status before the immigration judge if the statutory and regulatory requirements are satisfied. The respondent must file Form I-485 as an application for relief, comply with EOIR and DHS filing procedures, establish visa availability where applicable, prove admissibility or obtain required waivers, and show that adjustment merits favorable discretion.
Adjustment Becomes Defensive Relief

The same ultimate immigration benefit—lawful permanent residence—is adjudicated within a removal case rather than through ordinary affirmative USCIS processing.

See USCIS vs. Immigration Judge Jurisdiction.

Immigration judge jurisdiction

8 C.F.R. §1245.2(a)(1)(i) generally gives the immigration judge exclusive adjustment jurisdiction over a non-arriving alien placed in removal proceedings.

The immigration judge can adjudicate:

  • INA §245(a) eligibility;
  • INA §245(i);
  • INA §245(k);
  • Applicable adjustment bars;
  • Visa availability;
  • Admissibility;
  • Qualifying waivers within court jurisdiction;
  • Form I-864 sufficiency where applicable;
  • Evidence and credibility; and
  • Adjustment discretion.

Arriving aliens are an important exception

Arriving aliens generally remain under USCIS adjustment jurisdiction even when removal proceedings are pending.

Do Not File Defensively Until Jurisdiction Is Confirmed

8 C.F.R. §1245.2(a)(1)(ii) gives immigration judges arriving-alien adjustment jurisdiction only in a narrow four-part advance-parole situation.

See Arriving Alien Adjustment of Status Jurisdiction.

Underlying immigrant basis

The respondent must possess a legally sufficient immigrant basis.

Common examples include:

  • Approved immediate-relative Form I-130;
  • Approved family-preference Form I-130;
  • Approved employment Form I-140;
  • Approved VAWA Form I-360;
  • Approved special immigrant petition;
  • Qualifying INA §245(i) grandfathering; and
  • Other adjustment classifications within immigration judge jurisdiction.
USCIS Often Controls the Petition While the Judge Controls the I-485

The court may continue proceedings while USCIS adjudicates the petition needed to support adjustment.

Pending Form I-130

A respondent married to a U.S. citizen or LPR may have a Form I-130 pending with USCIS while removal proceedings continue.

The respondent may request time for USCIS adjudication based on factors such as:

  • Prima facie approvability of the petition;
  • Whether approval would materially affect adjustment eligibility;
  • Visa availability;
  • DHS position;
  • Respondent's diligence;
  • Number and length of prior continuances; and
  • Efficient case management.

A pending petition does not automatically require the immigration judge to continue the case indefinitely.

Marriage entered during proceedings

INA §245(e) imposes a special restriction on adjustment based on a marriage entered while specified immigration proceedings are pending.

The bona fide marriage exception generally requires clear and convincing evidence that:

  • The marriage was entered in good faith;
  • The marriage was not entered to obtain immigration benefits; and
  • The statutory exception is otherwise satisfied.

See Marriage During Removal Proceedings.

Visa availability

Preference-category respondents must have an immigrant visa immediately available at the time adjustment is granted.

The court should evaluate:

  • Priority date;
  • Preference category;
  • Country of chargeability;
  • Current Visa Bulletin;
  • Final Action Date; and
  • Derivative eligibility.
A Current Date at Filing Does Not Guarantee a Current Date at Trial

Visa retrogression can prevent the immigration judge from granting adjustment until a visa number becomes available again.

Admission or parole

An ordinary INA §245(a) respondent must generally establish inspection and admission or parole unless another statutory adjustment route applies.

Evidence can include:

  • Form I-94;
  • Passport stamps;
  • CBP records;
  • Parole documents;
  • Government records;
  • Wave-through evidence;
  • Witness testimony; and
  • Other reliable proof.

See Evidence of Admission or Parole.

INA §245(i)

Some respondents who entered without inspection or are otherwise barred under ordinary INA §245(a) can adjust under INA §245(i) if properly grandfathered and all other requirements are satisfied.

The court may need to determine:

  • Qualifying petition or labor certification;
  • Filing date;
  • Approvable-when-filed requirement;
  • Physical-presence requirement where applicable;
  • Derivative grandfathering;
  • Visa availability;
  • Supplement A and penalty fee; and
  • Admissibility.

See INA §245(i).

INA §245(k)

Qualifying employment-based respondents can invoke INA §245(k) before the immigration judge.

The respondent may need to establish that after the relevant lawful admission, aggregate periods of:

  • Failure to maintain lawful status;
  • Unauthorized employment; and
  • Other violations of admission terms

did not exceed 180 days.

See INA §245(k).

Admissibility

The respondent must establish admissibility as a permanent resident unless a waiver or exception applies.

Common court issues include:

  • CIMTs;
  • Controlled-substance offenses;
  • Drug-trafficking reason-to-believe findings;
  • Fraud or misrepresentation;
  • Unlawful presence;
  • Prior removal;
  • Alien smuggling;
  • False citizenship claims;
  • Public charge where applicable; and
  • Security grounds.
Removal Charges and Adjustment Inadmissibility Are Separate Analyses

The respondent can concede removability and still contest whether a particular inadmissibility ground bars adjustment.

Waivers in court

Where jurisdiction exists, a respondent can seek qualifying waivers together with adjustment.

Depending on the case, that can include:

  • INA §212(h);
  • INA §212(i);
  • Other statutory waivers within immigration judge jurisdiction; and
  • Related discretionary relief.

Each waiver has its own qualifying-relative, hardship, rehabilitation and discretionary requirements.

Current Form I-485 filing procedure in immigration court

EOIR currently instructs respondents seeking adjustment to:

  • Complete Form I-485;
  • File the application with the appropriate immigration court;
  • Serve a complete copy on ICE Office of the Principal Legal Advisor;
  • Comply with current filing-fee procedures;
  • Provide the required copy and payment information to USCIS under the current pre-order instructions;
  • Complete biometrics and background checks; and
  • File proof of fee and biometrics compliance with the immigration court as directed.
Follow the Current EOIR and USCIS Instructions

Court filing, USCIS fee processing and biometric procedures have changed over time. Do not rely on an old removal-case filing checklist.

Biometrics and background checks

8 C.F.R. §1003.47 requires completion of identity, security and background checks before the immigration judge grants certain forms of relief.

Failure to comply can result in:

  • Delay;
  • Finding that the application was abandoned;
  • Inability of the immigration judge to grant relief; or
  • Other procedural consequences.

Keep evidence showing completion of the USCIS biometrics process.

Individual merits hearing

The immigration judge can take testimony concerning:

  • Entry;
  • Marriage;
  • Employment;
  • Criminal history;
  • Immigration history;
  • Fraud allegations;
  • Waiver hardship;
  • Rehabilitation;
  • Discretionary equities; and
  • Any other disputed adjustment issue.

DHS counsel may cross-examine the respondent and witnesses.

Prepare the I-485 as Litigation

A defensive adjustment case can require pleadings, briefing, exhibits, witnesses and testimony rather than the paper-only presentation common in straightforward affirmative cases.

Discretion

Even after establishing statutory eligibility, the respondent must demonstrate that adjustment should be granted as a matter of discretion.

Positive equities can include:

  • U.S. citizen family;
  • LPR family;
  • Long residence;
  • Employment history;
  • Community service;
  • Rehabilitation;
  • Medical needs;
  • Military family ties;
  • Property and tax history; and
  • Other humanitarian factors.

Adverse factors should be addressed directly.

If USCIS Already Denied the Form I-485

A respondent whose Form I-485 was already denied by USCIS presents a more specific post-denial issue than a person simply seeking adjustment while removal proceedings are pending.

Where the regulations permit renewal, the respondent may be able to present the adjustment application again before the immigration judge. The strategy should begin with the actual USCIS denial and determine which factual or legal findings must be overcome in the renewed proceeding.

See Renewing Adjustment of Status in Removal Proceedings for that post-denial analysis.

If the immigration judge grants adjustment

Once the grant becomes administratively final:

  • The respondent becomes a lawful permanent resident;
  • Removal proceedings are resolved consistent with the grant;
  • USCIS updates the immigration record;
  • USCIS produces evidence of status; and
  • The new resident should monitor Permanent Resident Card production.

USCIS maintains post-order procedures for individuals granted adjustment by EOIR.

If the immigration judge denies adjustment

The respondent may generally appeal the immigration judge's final decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals within the applicable deadline.

The appeal record can include disputes concerning:

  • Adjustment eligibility;
  • Admissibility;
  • Waivers;
  • Evidentiary rulings;
  • Credibility;
  • Visa availability;
  • Discretion; and
  • Legal interpretation.

Example: EWI respondent grandfathered under §245(i)

Example

A non-arriving respondent entered without inspection and cannot use ordinary INA §245(a), but the respondent is properly grandfathered under INA §245(i), has an approved immigrant petition, an immediately available visa number and is otherwise admissible. The immigration judge can adjudicate §245(i) adjustment as relief from removal.

Example: approved I-130 but visa unavailable

Example

A respondent has an approved family-preference I-130 but the priority date is not current. The approved petition alone does not permit the immigration judge to grant adjustment because an immigrant visa must be immediately available at final adjudication.

Removal-proceedings adjustment checklist

  • Confirm immigration judge jurisdiction.
  • Determine whether respondent is an arriving alien.
  • Review NTA and removability charges.
  • Confirm immigrant petition status.
  • Confirm priority date and visa availability.
  • Analyze INA §245(a).
  • Analyze INA §245(c).
  • Analyze INA §245(i).
  • Analyze INA §245(k).
  • Analyze admissibility.
  • Prepare required waivers.
  • Prepare Form I-864 where required.
  • Follow current EOIR filing-fee procedure.
  • Serve ICE counsel.
  • Follow USCIS pre-order instructions.
  • Complete biometrics.
  • Meet court filing deadlines.
  • Prepare testimony and exhibits.
  • Prepare favorable discretion evidence.

Common court-adjustment mistakes

Filing With the Wrong Agency

A non-arriving respondent files only with USCIS despite the immigration judge's exclusive jurisdiction.

Ignoring Arriving-Alien Rules

A respondent files an I-485 with the immigration court even though USCIS retains jurisdiction.

Missing DHS Biometrics Procedure

The Form I-485 is filed with EOIR but required USCIS biometrics steps are not completed.

Ignoring Visa Availability

The respondent prepares the merits case without confirming a visa number can be allocated.

Failing to Address Discretion

The respondent proves technical eligibility but submits little evidence concerning adverse conduct or positive equities.

Assuming Petition Approval Equals Adjustment Approval

An approved I-130 or I-140 is treated as though it resolves admissibility, adjustment bars and discretion.

Primary authorities

8 C.F.R. §1245.2
Immigration judge adjustment jurisdiction.
8 C.F.R. §1240.11
Applications for adjustment and waivers in removal proceedings.
EOIR Adjustment of Status
Current EOIR filing requirements for Form I-485 in immigration court.
USCIS Pre-Order Instructions for EOIR Applications
Current DHS fee, copy and biometrics procedures for designated applications filed in immigration court.

Frequently asked questions

Can an immigration judge grant a green card?

Yes. Immigration judges can grant adjustment of status as relief from removal when they have jurisdiction and the respondent establishes eligibility and favorable discretion.

Where do I file Form I-485 in removal proceedings?

A non-arriving respondent generally files the adjustment application with the immigration court and follows the current DHS copy, fee and biometrics procedures.

Does USCIS still decide my I-130?

Generally yes. USCIS can retain immigrant-petition jurisdiction while the immigration judge adjudicates Form I-485.

Can I adjust if I entered without inspection?

Ordinary INA §245(a) generally requires admission or parole, but qualifying respondents may have another route such as INA §245(i).

Can I file waivers with the I-485?

Potentially, where the immigration judge has jurisdiction over the applicable waiver.

What if the judge denies adjustment?

A final immigration judge decision can generally be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals under the applicable EOIR rules.

Adjustment in removal proceedings is not simply a USCIS filing moved into a courtroom. It is litigation over eligibility, admissibility, waivers and discretion.

The Messersmith Law Firm, P.A. represents respondents seeking adjustment in immigration court through family petitions, employment petitions, INA §245(i), INA §245(k), waivers, VAWA and other qualifying immigrant classifications.

Schedule a Consultation
Legal review date: August 30, 2026. EOIR filing fees, payment systems, biometrics procedures and local court requirements can change; verify current instructions before filing.