INA245.com

EB-5 Conditional Resident Bar Under INA §245(f)

Home› Adjustment Bars › EB-5 Conditional Resident Bar
INA §245(f) • INA §216A • EB-5 Investors

EB-5 Conditional Permanent Resident Bar Under INA §245(f)

INA §245(f) prevents an EB-5 investor, spouse, or child who currently holds conditional permanent resident status under INA §216A from obtaining another grant of permanent residence through ordinary INA §245(a). Instead, the EB-5 conditional resident generally must use Form I-829 to remove the conditions on the existing permanent residence. The rule prevents an investor from sidestepping the investment and job-creation requirements attached to conditional EB-5 residence by switching to a family or other employment-based adjustment application. USCIS applies the same basic Matter of Stockwell principle after conditional residence has been properly terminated: the conditional-resident adjustment bar no longer necessarily prevents a new §245(a) case.

Core Rule

An EB-5 conditional resident cannot normally trade the I-829 process for a second Form I-485.

Section 245(f) directly bars §245(a) adjustment while permanent residence remains conditional under INA §216A. Marriage to a U.S. citizen, approval of a new I-140, or another immigrant classification does not by itself eliminate that restriction.

Three Separate Stages

The EB-5 case changes materially after conditional residence is granted

01

EB-5 Immigrant Classification

The investor establishes eligibility through the applicable EB-5 immigrant petition and visa-availability process.

02

Conditional Residence

The investor and qualifying derivatives receive lawful permanent residence on a conditional basis under INA §216A.

03

Form I-829

The investor generally proves the statutory investment and employment-creation requirements necessary to remove the conditions.

INA §216A

Conditional EB-5 residence is already lawful permanent residence.

An EB-5 investor who obtains conditional permanent residence is not merely waiting for an immigrant visa or adjustment decision. The person is already a lawful permanent resident, subject to the conditions Congress imposed under INA §216A.

Section 245(f) prevents a current EB-5 conditional resident from using ordinary §245(a) to obtain a fresh permanent-residence grant on a new basis.

Instead, the investor ordinarily proceeds through Form I-829 to have the conditional basis removed.

INA §245(f) is the EB-5 conditional-resident adjustment bar

INA §245(f) states that the Attorney General may not adjust under subsection (a) the status of a person lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence on a conditional basis under INA §216A.

Plain Statutory Rule

A current EB-5 conditional permanent resident generally cannot receive another §245(a) adjustment grant while the §216A conditional residence remains in effect.

The statute operates separately from the §245(c) adjustment bars.

INA §216A governs EB-5 conditional residence

INA §216A applies conditional permanent resident status to qualifying EB-5 investors and qualifying derivative spouses and children.

The statute governs:

  • The conditional basis of the residence;
  • Termination of conditional status;
  • The petition to remove conditions;
  • Investment requirements;
  • Job-creation requirements;
  • Interview provisions;
  • Derivative treatment; and
  • Review of adverse determinations.
The 2022 EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act amended INA §216A. Current cases should be evaluated under the statutory provisions applicable to the particular investor and petition date.

Who is subject to §245(f)?

The bar applies to a person currently holding conditional permanent residence under INA §216A.

That can include:

  • The principal EB-5 investor;
  • The investor's qualifying spouse whose residence is derivative; and
  • The investor's qualifying child whose residence is derivative.
The bar turns on the existing conditional permanent resident status, not merely on the existence of an EB-5 petition. A person with only a pending or approved I-526 or I-526E is not subject to §245(f) merely for that reason.

Form I-829 is the normal route to unconditional permanent residence

Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status, is the statutory mechanism for an EB-5 conditional resident to seek removal of the conditions.

The petition addresses whether the investor satisfies the requirements imposed by INA §216A and the applicable EB-5 provisions.

A new I-485 is not a substitute for an approvable I-829 while conditional residence remains in force.

The I-829 filing period

Current INA §216A generally requires the I-829 petition to be filed during the 90-day period immediately preceding the second anniversary of the investor's lawful admission for permanent residence.

Current USCIS I-829 instructions likewise direct investors to file during that 90-day period.

There are specialized statutory rules for certain investors affected by later or subsequent investment provisions. The precise petition history should be reviewed before calculating the filing window.

What the I-829 must establish

Current INA §216A requires the petition to contain evidence addressing the EB-5 investment and job-creation requirements.

Depending on the governing petition and statutory regime, the evidence can involve:

  • The required capital investment;
  • Compliance with applicable investment requirements;
  • Creation of the required qualifying employment;
  • Active progress toward required employment where the statute allows additional time;
  • Continued conformity with the requirements of INA §203(b)(5);
  • The new commercial enterprise;
  • Regional center or job-creating entity evidence where applicable; and
  • Other requirements imposed by the applicable EB-5 law.
Section 245(f)'s Purpose

The readjustment bar prevents an investor from avoiding this statutory I-829 review by switching to an unrelated immigrant petition while still holding conditional EB-5 residence.

Derivative spouses and children

INA §216A also governs conditional residence obtained by qualifying spouses and children of the EB-5 investor.

Current I-829 procedures permit qualifying derivatives to be included in or, in specified circumstances, separately file the removal-of-conditions petition.

Current USCIS instructions address situations involving:

  • A spouse;
  • A former spouse;
  • Children who have turned 21;
  • Children who marry during conditional residence;
  • Derivatives not included in the principal's petition; and
  • Death of the principal investor.
Changes in age or marital status do not automatically eliminate every derivative's I-829 eligibility. The specific §216A and filing rules control.

Marriage to a U.S. citizen while holding EB-5 conditional residence

Suppose an EB-5 conditional resident later marries a U.S. citizen who files Form I-130.

Approval of the I-130 does not itself allow USCIS to approve a new §245(a) adjustment while the EB-5 conditional resident status remains in effect.

Immediate-relative status does not override INA §245(f). The immediate-relative exemptions in §245(c) concern different statutory bars.

A new employment petition also does not ordinarily bypass §245(f)

An EB-5 conditional resident might later qualify for:

  • EB-1A;
  • EB-1B;
  • EB-1C;
  • EB-2 NIW;
  • EB-2 PERM;
  • EB-3; or
  • Another employment-based immigrant classification.

The new petition can potentially become important after termination of the EB-5 conditional status, but it does not itself permit readjustment while §216A conditional residence remains in force.

INA §245(k) does not override §245(f). Section 245(k) only overrides §245(c)(2), (7), and (8).

Termination of EB-5 conditional residence

INA §216A permits termination of conditional residence under specified circumstances.

Potential issues include:

  • Failure to timely file Form I-829;
  • Failure to establish the required investment;
  • Failure to satisfy qualifying employment-creation requirements;
  • Failure to remain in conformity with applicable EB-5 requirements;
  • Adverse findings concerning the investment; and
  • Other statutory grounds for termination.
Termination can remove one obstacle while creating others. Ending conditional residence may eliminate §245(f), but it can also create removability and require litigation over the underlying EB-5 determination.

USCIS applies the Stockwell principle to §§245(d) and 245(f)

Matter of Stockwell itself arose under family-based conditional residence and INA §245(d).

USCIS's November 21, 2019 policy guidance expressly addresses both §245(d) and §245(f).

USCIS explained that both provisions bar a person currently holding conditional permanent residence from adjusting under §245(a), while Stockwell allows adjustment on a new basis after the conditional permanent resident status has been terminated in qualifying circumstances.

USCIS Policy

The controlling question for the conditional-resident bar is whether the person still holds conditional permanent resident status when seeking the new §245(a) adjustment.

Adjustment on a new basis after EB-5 CPR termination

After termination, a former EB-5 conditional resident may potentially seek adjustment based on:

  • Marriage to a U.S. citizen;
  • Another qualifying family petition;
  • EB-1;
  • EB-2 or NIW;
  • EB-3;
  • VAWA;
  • A special immigrant petition;
  • Diversity Visa eligibility; or
  • Another qualifying immigrant basis.

The new case must independently establish:

  • Eligibility under §245(a) or another adjustment statute;
  • A qualifying immigrant basis;
  • Visa availability;
  • Admissibility;
  • No applicable adjustment bar;
  • Jurisdiction; and
  • Favorable discretion.
A failed EB-5 case can create issues in the new adjustment case. USCIS may examine fraud, source-of-funds representations, misrepresentation, criminal activity, removal history, or other adverse findings from the EB-5 record.

EB-5 CPR termination and removal proceedings

A person whose EB-5 conditional residence has been terminated can seek review of specified adverse determinations in removal proceedings.

The proceeding can involve:

  • Whether the termination was legally proper;
  • The truth of the I-829 evidence;
  • Compliance with investment requirements;
  • Job creation;
  • Fraud allegations;
  • The burden of proof specified by INA §216A;
  • Eligibility for a new adjustment basis; and
  • Other available relief from removal.
Litigating the termination and seeking a new adjustment basis can raise strategic conflicts. The applicant's position concerning whether CPR status still exists should be consistent with the relief being requested.

Late Form I-829 filings

Current INA §216A and USCIS instructions permit consideration of a late I-829 where the investor establishes good cause and extenuating circumstances for failing to file during the prescribed 90-day period.

Before Abandoning I-829

A missed filing window should not automatically be treated as requiring a new adjustment application. Determine first whether USCIS can accept a late I-829.

Current I-829 instructions warn that failure to timely file can lead to termination of conditional permanent resident status and removability.

The EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act changed the statutory framework

The EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 amended significant portions of the EB-5 program, including INA §216A.

Current EB-5 conditional-residence analysis may depend on:

  • When the underlying petition was filed;
  • Whether the investment is direct or regional-center based;
  • The statutory requirements applicable to the petition;
  • Investment sustainment rules;
  • Job-creation timing;
  • Regional-center sanctions or termination;
  • Good-faith investor protections; and
  • Any statutory cure, reassociation, or redeployment provisions.
Do not apply pre-2022 EB-5 rules mechanically to every current I-829. The petition date and statutory transition provisions can matter.

INA §245(f) expressly refers to adjustment under subsection (a)

Like the family conditional-resident bar in §245(d), §245(f) states that the person may not be adjusted “under subsection (a).”

A person pursuing permanent residence through an entirely separate adjustment statute may therefore require a different analysis.

This is a statute-specific question. Do not assume that every special adjustment program either applies or does not apply merely because §245(f) is present. Analyze the independent statute and its interaction with existing LPR status.

Evidence checklist for an INA §245(f) case

EvidencePurpose
I-526 or I-526E petitionEstablishes the original EB-5 immigrant classification and applicable statutory regime.
I-485 or immigrant visa recordEstablishes when and how EB-5 CPR status began.
Conditional Form I-551Shows EB-5 conditional residence.
Form I-829Shows whether removal of conditions was requested.
I-829 receipt noticeDocuments continued conditional-resident evidence during adjudication.
I-829 decisionIdentifies approval, denial, or termination issues.
Investment evidenceAddresses capital, sustainment, enterprise, and statutory compliance.
Job-creation evidenceAddresses the employment requirements under the applicable EB-5 statute.
Termination noticeImportant to determining whether §245(f) remains applicable.
New immigrant petitionEstablishes a proposed adjustment basis after CPR termination.
Removal recordsEstablish jurisdiction and review of termination.

Frequently asked questions

I have an EB-5 conditional green card. Can I adjust through my U.S. citizen spouse?

Generally not while EB-5 conditional permanent resident status remains in effect. INA §245(f) bars ordinary §245(a) readjustment.

Can I adjust through EB-1 or NIW instead of filing I-829?

Not ordinarily while you remain an EB-5 conditional permanent resident. A new immigrant petition does not eliminate §245(f).

What is the normal way to remove EB-5 conditions?

Form I-829 is the statutory removal-of-conditions procedure for qualifying EB-5 investors and derivatives.

When is Form I-829 filed?

Current law generally requires filing during the 90-day period immediately preceding the second anniversary of the investor's conditional permanent residence, subject to specialized statutory rules and late-filing provisions.

Can USCIS accept a late I-829?

Potentially. Current INA §216A and USCIS instructions permit consideration of a late filing where good cause and extenuating circumstances are established.

Can I file a new I-485 after my EB-5 conditional residence is terminated?

Potentially. USCIS policy applying Matter of Stockwell recognizes adjustment on a new basis after termination of conditional residence when the applicant independently qualifies.

Does INA §245(k) override §245(f)?

No. Section 245(k) overrides only §245(c)(2), §245(c)(7), and §245(c)(8).

Are my spouse and children also conditional residents?

Qualifying EB-5 derivative spouses and children generally obtain conditional permanent resident status under INA §216A and must be addressed through the applicable I-829 procedures.

Primary Authorities

EB-5 conditional-resident authorities

Legal content reviewed August 30, 2026. Current INA §245(f) bars ordinary §245(a) adjustment while a person holds conditional permanent residence under INA §216A. Current INA §216A generally requires the investor's removal-of-conditions petition during the 90-day period preceding the second anniversary of conditional residence, with a late-filing provision for good cause and extenuating circumstances. USCIS's Stockwell policy addresses adjustment on a new basis after conditional permanent residence has been terminated.

Does an EB-5 conditional-residence problem affect another immigration strategy?

The Messersmith Law Firm, P.A. handles complex adjustment matters involving conditional residence, EB-5 immigration history, termination of status, new family or employment petitions, inadmissibility, removal proceedings, RFEs, NOIDs, and I-485 denials.

Schedule a Consultation