INA245.com

TPS and Adjustment of Status

Home› Special Adjustment Categories› TPS & Adjustment of Status
INA §244 • INA §245(a) • TPS Travel • Form I-512T

Temporary Protected Status and Adjustment of Status

Temporary Protected Status can protect a qualifying beneficiary from removal and provide work authorization, but TPS does not automatically create an admission for adjustment of status. The Supreme Court confirmed that rule in Sanchez v. Mayorkas. A different result may arise when a TPS beneficiary travels abroad with DHS authorization and is inspected and admitted into TPS upon return under the current statutory and USCIS travel framework.

2022 Policy

TPS-authorized travel can now produce an admission for INA §245(a).

USCIS rescinded Matter of Z-R-Z-C- as an adopted decision and revised its policy in July 2022.

Under the current framework, a TPS beneficiary who travels abroad temporarily with prior DHS authorization and returns in accordance with that authorization may be inspected and admitted into TPS. USCIS treats that qualifying admission as an inspection and admission for INA §245(a) and §245(k), even when the person originally obtained TPS after entering without inspection.

Does TPS allow someone who entered without inspection to adjust status?

TPS alone does not. Sanchez v. Mayorkas holds that a grant of TPS does not satisfy INA §245(a)'s inspected-and-admitted requirement for someone whose original entry was without inspection. But a qualifying TPS beneficiary who later travels with DHS authorization and is inspected and admitted into TPS upon return can acquire the admission needed for §245(a), subject to every other adjustment requirement.

Three Different TPS Effects

TPS can affect status, removal protection, and admission differently

01

TPS Status

During a valid TPS period, INA §244 provides temporary immigration protections and specified lawful-status treatment for certain adjustment and change-of-status purposes.

02

Original Admission

TPS does not retroactively transform an original EWI into an admission. Sanchez makes that distinction controlling nationwide.

03

Later TPS Travel

A qualifying return following DHS-authorized TPS travel may constitute inspection and admission into TPS for §245(a) and §245(k).

Supreme Court Rule

Sanchez v. Mayorkas: TPS status is not the same as admission.

In Sanchez v. Mayorkas, 593 U.S. 409 (2021), the Supreme Court addressed a TPS beneficiary who had originally entered the United States without inspection.

The Court held that TPS did not itself satisfy INA §245(a)'s requirement that the adjustment applicant have been inspected and admitted or paroled.

The Court's holding concerns the grant of TPS itself. USCIS's later 2022 policy separately addresses a beneficiary who departs with DHS authorization and is inspected and admitted into TPS upon return.

What Temporary Protected Status does

TPS is a temporary humanitarian protection available to eligible nationals of countries designated under INA §244 and, in some circumstances, eligible persons without nationality who last habitually resided in a designated country.

While TPS remains valid, a beneficiary generally receives:

  • Protection from removal based solely on lack of immigration status;
  • Eligibility for employment authorization;
  • Temporary immigration protection for the designated period; and
  • Eligibility to request DHS authorization for qualifying travel.
Critical Distinction

TPS is temporary protection. It is not itself lawful permanent residence and does not automatically establish adjustment eligibility.

Sanchez v. Mayorkas

The Supreme Court resolved a long-running dispute over whether TPS itself could satisfy the admission requirement of INA §245(a).

The Court held that it cannot.

A TPS beneficiary who originally entered without inspection remains unable to point to the TPS grant itself as the qualifying inspection and admission required by §245(a).

TPS does not retroactively rewrite the original entry. If the person entered EWI and has never subsequently obtained a qualifying admission or parole, the §245(a) threshold ordinarily remains unsatisfied unless another statute applies.

See Entry Without Inspection and Adjustment of Status.

TPS and lawful immigration status for adjustment purposes

INA §244(f)(4) provides special status treatment during a valid TPS period for purposes of adjustment under INA §245 and change of status under INA §248.

This can help a TPS beneficiary with status-related adjustment questions during the TPS period.

This status rule is not the same as admission. Sanchez confirms that the lawful-status treatment in INA §244(f)(4) does not itself satisfy the separate inspection-and-admission requirement in §245(a).

See Admission vs. Lawful Status.

TPS does not automatically erase status violations before TPS

The special lawful-status treatment during TPS does not necessarily cure immigration violations that occurred before TPS was granted.

This distinction can be crucial for applicants who are not immediate relatives and who are subject to INA §245(c)(2) or §245(c)(7).

PeriodGeneral Adjustment Significance
Original EWI before TPSTPS alone does not cure the missing §245(a) admission.
Unlawful status before TPSMay remain relevant to §245(c) unless an exemption applies.
Valid TPS periodReceives special lawful-status treatment under INA §244(f)(4).
Qualifying TPS travel and returnMay create an admission for §245(a) and §245(k).

TPS-authorized travel under current USCIS policy

USCIS substantially revised its TPS travel policy on July 1, 2022.

A TPS beneficiary may request authorization to travel temporarily outside the United States under the TPS travel framework.

When DHS authorizes the travel and the beneficiary returns in accordance with the authorization, the person may be inspected and admitted into TPS.

Current USCIS Rule

A qualifying TPS admission after authorized travel can satisfy inspection and admission for both INA §245(a) and INA §245(k).

This applies even when the beneficiary originally received TPS after entering without inspection.

Form I-512T and TPS Travel Authorization

USCIS created Form I-512T, Authorization for Travel by a Noncitizen to the United States, for the current TPS-specific travel framework.

A TPS beneficiary inside the United States generally requests TPS travel authorization through Form I-131 under the current USCIS filing procedures.

USCIS's current fee schedule identifies a TPS Travel Authorization Document as a specific Form I-131 category.

TPS travel is no longer best described simply as ordinary “advance parole.” The current Form I-512T framework is designed to allow a qualifying TPS beneficiary to seek admission into TPS upon return.

How TPS travel can create the admission needed for §245(a)

Consider a person who:

  1. Originally entered the United States without inspection;
  2. Later obtained TPS;
  3. Maintained TPS;
  4. Obtained DHS authorization for temporary TPS travel;
  5. Departed in accordance with that authorization; and
  6. Returned and was inspected and admitted into TPS.

Under current USCIS policy, that final admission can satisfy the inspected-and-admitted requirement for ordinary adjustment under INA §245(a).

The admission does not automatically make Form I-485 approvable. Adjustment bars, prior violations, immigrant classification, visa availability, inadmissibility, removal history, and discretion must still be analyzed.

TPS travel and INA §245(k)

USCIS's 2022 policy also recognizes a qualifying TPS admission after authorized travel as a lawful admission for INA §245(k).

This can be highly significant for an employment-based adjustment applicant because §245(k) measures specified violations after the applicant's most recent lawful admission.

TPS travel and ordinary advance parole are different for this purpose. Ordinary parole generally does not constitute the “last lawful admission” used by §245(k), while the current TPS travel framework can produce an admission into TPS recognized for §245(k).

See INA §245(k) and Multiple Entries and Last Lawful Admission.

Older TPS travel before the 2022 policy change

The legal treatment of older TPS travel can be more complicated because DHS historically used advance-parole documents and later adopted Matter of Z-R-Z-C-, which USCIS subsequently rescinded.

USCIS's 2022 policy permits consideration of certain prior TPS-authorized travel under the revised framework on a case-by-case basis.

Relevant questions include:

  • Date of travel;
  • Whether TPS was valid at departure and return;
  • What travel document DHS issued;
  • Whether travel was authorized under INA §244(f)(3);
  • How CBP processed the return;
  • What the I-94 or entry record states;
  • Whether the applicant relied on earlier USCIS policy; and
  • Whether another statutory problem independently prevents adjustment.
Do not assume an old I-512L marked “parole” necessarily receives the same treatment as ordinary adjustment-based advance parole. USCIS's post-2022 TPS policy requires analysis of the TPS-specific travel authority.

TPS travel and prior removal orders

A prior deportation or removal order requires separate review before TPS travel or adjustment.

USCIS has historically recognized specialized statutory treatment for qualifying TPS-authorized travel by beneficiaries with outstanding removal orders, but the precise procedural history remains important.

Potential issues include:

  • Whether the prior order remains outstanding;
  • Whether departure executes or affects the order;
  • INA §212(a)(9)(A);
  • INA §212(a)(9)(C);
  • Reinstatement;
  • USCIS versus immigration-court jurisdiction;
  • Any pending EOIR motion; and
  • Whether permission to reapply is required.
TPS travel authorization is not an across-the-board waiver of a prior removal history. The order and every statutory inadmissibility consequence should be reviewed before departure.

TPS admission does not waive inadmissibility

A beneficiary who obtains a qualifying admission after TPS travel must still establish admissibility when seeking adjustment.

Possible issues include:

  • Criminal grounds;
  • Controlled-substance grounds;
  • Fraud or willful misrepresentation;
  • False claim to U.S. citizenship;
  • Alien smuggling;
  • Prior removal;
  • INA §212(a)(9)(C);
  • Security-related grounds; and
  • Other applicable provisions of INA §212.
Separate Question

TPS travel may solve the §245(a) admission problem without solving inadmissibility.

TPS and unlawful presence

TPS, unlawful status, and unlawful presence are separate concepts.

A valid TPS period can affect unlawful-presence calculations, but time accrued before TPS and the consequences of later departure should be analyzed independently.

Because current law concerning advance-parole departure changed in August 2026 through Matter of Delcarmen-Lara, care should also be taken to distinguish ordinary adjustment-based advance parole from TPS travel authorized under INA §244(f)(3).

Identify the travel authority first. A TPS-specific Form I-512T return should not automatically be analyzed as though it were an ordinary advance-parole return.

TPS beneficiary adjusting through a U.S. citizen relative

A TPS beneficiary may later acquire an immediate-relative immigrant basis through:

  • Marriage to a U.S. citizen;
  • A U.S. citizen child who turns 21 and petitions for the parent; or
  • A qualifying U.S. citizen parent petitioning for an unmarried child under 21.

If the TPS beneficiary originally entered lawfully, the existing admission may already satisfy §245(a).

If the beneficiary originally entered without inspection, TPS alone does not create the required admission, but a qualifying TPS travel return may do so.

Immediate-relative status can also exempt the applicant from specified §245(c) bars. That exemption is separate from the admission requirement.

See Family-Based Adjustment of Status.

TPS beneficiary seeking employment-based adjustment

Employment-based adjustment can be more difficult because the applicant must analyze both §245(a) and the employment-related bars in §245(c).

Important questions include:

  • Was the applicant originally admitted?
  • What lawful status existed before TPS?
  • Were there status violations before TPS?
  • Did unauthorized employment occur?
  • Did qualifying TPS travel produce a new lawful admission?
  • Does INA §245(k) apply?
  • How many covered days accrued after the most recent lawful admission?
Employment-Based Strategy

A qualifying TPS travel admission may solve the admission element and may become the measuring point for §245(k), but prior and subsequent violations still require precise analysis.

See Employment-Based Adjustment.

TPS and current USCIS adjustment discretion

Meeting the statutory admission requirement through qualifying TPS travel does not guarantee Form I-485 approval.

Where adjustment is discretionary, USCIS may consider the totality of relevant circumstances, including:

  • Long-term residence;
  • Family ties;
  • Humanitarian circumstances;
  • Employment history;
  • Immigration violations before TPS;
  • Compliance while in TPS;
  • Criminal history;
  • Representations made during immigration processing; and
  • Other favorable and unfavorable factors.
The grant of TPS itself is lawful immigration protection. Any discretionary analysis should distinguish lawful reliance on TPS from separate immigration violations occurring before, during, or after the protected period.

Frequently asked questions

Does TPS count as a lawful admission?

No. The Supreme Court held in Sanchez v. Mayorkas that the grant of TPS itself does not satisfy INA §245(a)'s admission requirement.

I entered without inspection and later received TPS. Can I adjust through my U.S. citizen spouse?

TPS alone does not cure the EWI. A qualifying TPS-authorized travel and inspected return, §245(i), or another statutory mechanism may change the analysis.

Can travel with TPS create an admission?

Under current USCIS policy, yes. A qualifying TPS beneficiary who travels with prior DHS authorization and is inspected and admitted into TPS upon return can satisfy the admission requirement for §245(a) and §245(k).

Is TPS travel the same as advance parole?

Not under the current framework. USCIS uses Form I-512T for TPS Travel Authorization, and the return is intended to permit admission into TPS rather than ordinary parole.

Does TPS erase unlawful status from before TPS?

No. INA §244(f)(4) provides specified lawful-status treatment during the TPS period, but pre-TPS violations can remain relevant.

Can a TPS travel admission restart the §245(k) calculation?

USCIS treats qualifying inspection and admission into TPS after authorized travel as a lawful admission for §245(k), so it can become relevant to the statutory measuring period.

Primary Authorities

TPS adjustment authorities

Legal content reviewed August 29, 2026. This page reflects Sanchez v. Mayorkas and USCIS's post-2022 TPS travel policy, including Form I-512T and recognition of qualifying inspection and admission into TPS for INA §245(a) and §245(k).

Does your adjustment case depend on TPS or TPS travel?

The Messersmith Law Firm, P.A. handles complex adjustment matters involving TPS, entry without inspection, TPS travel, INA §245(a), INA §245(k), prior removal, inadmissibility, RFEs, NOIDs, and I-485 denials.

Schedule a Consultation